• Add your business news
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Policy
Recruitmenttech.com
  • Home
  • Latest
  • Subscribe to the email update
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest
  • Subscribe to the email update
No Result
View All Result
Recruitmenttech.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Technology Applicant tracking systems (ATS)

Building versus buying: an applicant tracking system (ATS)

September 19, 2022
in Applicant tracking systems (ATS)
Reading Time: 5 mins read
123
Share on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsappShare via email

The building versus buying debate has been sparked by the news that Tesla built its own proprietary recruitment software for tracking job applicants. Should you be building or should you be buying?

Finding the right system in a fragmented market

Whether you’ve got an endless budget, or an ending budget — an applicant tracking system is used by roughly 90% or more of large companies. Through automating several parts of the application and evaluation process, the right ATS helps companies save incredible amounts of time and money. According to Polaris, global applicant tracking system market was valued at $2.35 billion in 2021 and is expected to grow incrementally over the coming years. The rise in the need for automation in the recruitment process has primarily driven the growth of the global market.

A 2022 Recruiting Brainfood survey found approximately 200 different applicant tracking systems.

But finding the right system is easier said than done. A 2022 Recruiting Brainfood survey found approximately 200 different applicant tracking systems. “It tells its own story on how fragmented the ATS market really is”, Recruiting Brainfood’s Hung Lee said. With a whopping 497 net positive responses, Greenhouse led the way in Recruiting Brainfood’s survey. Followed by Lever, with 201 net positive responses. SmartRecruiters, meanwhile, rounds off the top three with a total of 127 net positive responses.

Building versus buying

While there are many options out there, when it comes to applicant tracking systems, some companies get so picky they just decide to build their own. Tesla has been the latest company to opt to spend time and resources on building its own recruitment technology. According to a new report in The Information, the company has succeeded in building its own proprietary software for tracking job applicants. 

Photo credit: Steve Jurvetson (Flickr)

Are companies better off spending time and money building their own, tailor-made system, designed specifically to cater their needs?

According to reports, the primary reason comes down to CEO Elon Musk not being too keen on the company’s use of external software vendors. It has sparked yet another building versus buying debate. Are companies better off spending time and money building their own, tailor-made system, designed specifically to cater their needs? Or should they just rely on the software that’s out there?

Companies that built their own

We can find out who build their own ATS through 2020 research conducted by Apps Run The World. According to their research, 5 of the top 25 companies worldwide use their own, in-house ATS. China-based Sinopec, Apple, Amazon, Volkswagen Group, China State Construction Engineering, Netherlands-based EXOR all use a self-built ATS. When looking at the full, top 500 of global companies, in-house applications actually rank second among most-used systems. Oracle Taleo ranks first, while Workday, SAP Successfactors and IBM Kenexa BrassRing rounds off the top five. 

When looking at the full, top 500 of global companies, in-house applications actually rank second among most-used systems.

Source: Apps Run The World

Apps Run The World also found that smaller companies very rarely use an in-house ATS. According to their research, companies with 0 to 100 employees make up about 1.7% of the total amount of companies that use self-built applicant tracking systems. Notably, with 59.4%, Germany comes out as the country where by far the most amount of companies use a self-built ATS. The United States (12.8%) ranks second, while China (7.3%) ranks third. 

High failure rates

Now, companies that failed to successfully build their own ATS aren’t likely to send out press releases anytime soon —but according to Bobby Bartlett, Director of Enterprise Accounts at TargetRecruit, there’s a high failure rate among ‘top companies with deep pockets’ that aimed to launch their own, custom system built on CRM market leader Salesforce. “I have seen top 10 companies in the US and UK with deep pockets sink years into a custom build on Salesforce, only to abandon the effort and opt for a pre-built solution. It’s easy to crash and burn.”

“Imagine refusing to give up on a custom build because you are so heavily invested you won’t call it quits.  It happens all the time.”

Bartlett describes a two-year, $2M+ project that launched but just didn’t work. “But it gets worse”, he said. “Imagine refusing to give up on a custom build because you are so heavily invested you won’t call it quits. Here, entrepreneurial pride and job security sabotage the project, leaving you stuck with a troublesome, half-baked solution simply to avoid calling it a failure. It happens all the time. Sad, but true.”

“Just ask Robert Half recruiters after almost a lost decade, they are still struggling with customising Salesforce to do what they need and they have unlimited resources.”

“In my opinion building on top of an existing database is the worst possible option”, Matt Chambers, CEO at Loxo, wrote. “Just ask Robert Half recruiters after almost a lost decade, they are still struggling with customising Salesforce to do what they need and they have unlimited resources. This was supposed to be the easiest option for them to get their own custom ATS + CRM. Now it is super old and they’ve invested too much to stop now.”

There’s always a risk

Whether you decide to buy or to build, there’s always a risk involved. Candidates are finding ways to work around whatever pre-screening or screening system you have in place, by finding workarounds with fonts, keywords and templates. Moreover, candidates can grow annoyed by the lack of a human touch. Generic ‘thank you for submitting your application, if your qualifications meet our needs, we’ll contact you’-type e-mails should be a thing of the past.

“Checking a resume that your ATS didn’t rank highly may lead you to your next great employee.”

The success of any system lives and dies with a human touch, said John Pierce, Head of Recruiting at Stifel. “Common ATS features, such as automatic candidate rankings based on keyword searches, can certainly give you an idea of who may be a good fit. However, certain kinds of formatting may confuse your ATS, and qualified candidates who haven’t keyword-optimised their resumes may fall to the bottom of the list. Keep these limitations in mind, as checking a resume that your ATS didn’t rank highly may lead you to your next great employee.”

Have you built your own?

We’re looking for case stories of companies that have built their own ATS, or propriety recruitment technology. Reach out to us, and let us know about your experiences.

Tags: ADPapplicant tracking systemApps Run The WorldATSElon MuskRecruiting BrainfoodRecruitmentRecruitment TechnologysalesforcesapTeslaWorkday

Receive a push message with a new article on Recruitmenttech.com.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

Exclusive interview with George LaRocque (WorkTech): ‘COVID is an accelerator, not a creator of tech trends’

Next Post

Newcastle-based recruitment tech firm Haystack looks to break into US with £500k investment

Jasper Spanjaart

Jasper Spanjaart

Related Posts

Stuart Smith (Applied): ‘There’s no other ATS with a leading focus on diversity and inclusion’
Applicant tracking systems (ATS)

Stuart Smith (Applied): ‘There’s no other ATS with a leading focus on diversity and inclusion’

by Jasper Spanjaart
October 3, 2022
Stop the hiring discrimination of your applicant tracking system
Applicant tracking systems (ATS)

Stop the hiring discrimination of your applicant tracking system

by 1st Editor
May 4, 2022
What are recruiters’ favourite applicant tracking systems (ATS) for 2022?
Applicant tracking systems (ATS)

What are recruiters’ favourite applicant tracking systems (ATS) for 2022?

by Jasper Spanjaart
February 8, 2022
Recruitment operating platform Vincere acquired by Access Group
Applicant tracking systems (ATS)

Recruitment operating platform Vincere acquired by Access Group

by Martijn Hemminga
January 7, 2022
5 things you can expect from a free applicant tracking system (ATS)
Applicant tracking systems (ATS)

5 things you can expect from a free applicant tracking system (ATS)

by Jasper Spanjaart
November 24, 2021
Next Post
Newcastle-based recruitment tech firm Haystack looks to break into US with £500k investment

Newcastle-based recruitment tech firm Haystack looks to break into US with £500k investment

Friday Fact: Only 14% of organisations consider their AI maturity ‘advanced’

Friday Fact: Only 14% of organisations consider their AI maturity ‘advanced’

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow us on social

Events calendar

  • No events
  • all events
    • Contact
    • Privacy Statement
    • Cookie Policy

    © 2020-2021 Recruitment Tech Network | Europalaan 500 3526 KS UTRECHT, the Netherlands

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • Latest
    • Subscribe to the email update

    © 2020-2021 Recruitment Tech Network | Europalaan 500 3526 KS UTRECHT, the Netherlands

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In